↓ Skip to main content

Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training—a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training—a systematic review
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anneli Wall, Jörgen Borg, Susanne Palmcrantz

Abstract

The aim of this study was to review the literature on clinical applications of the Hybrid Assistive Limb system for gait training. A systematic literature search was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL and clinicaltrials.gov and additional search was made using reference lists in identified reports. Abstracts were screened, relevant articles were reviewed and subject to quality assessment. Out of 37 studies, 7 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. Six studies were single group studies and 1 was an explorative randomized controlled trial. In total, these studies involved 140 participants of whom 118 completed the interventions and 107 used HAL for gait training. Five studies concerned gait training after stroke, 1 after spinal cord injury (SCI) and 1 study after stroke, SCI or other diseases affecting walking ability. Minor and transient side effects occurred but no serious adverse events were reported in the studies. Beneficial effects on gait function variables and independence in walking were observed. The accumulated findings demonstrate that the HAL system is feasible when used for gait training of patients with lower extremity paresis in a professional setting. Beneficial effects on gait function and independence in walking were observed but data do not allow conclusions. Further controlled studies are recommended.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 216 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 17%
Researcher 35 16%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Other 15 7%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 56 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 63 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Neuroscience 13 6%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 61 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,951,137
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#560
of 1,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,822
of 263,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#25
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.