↓ Skip to main content

Visual system plasticity in mammals: the story of monocular enucleation-induced vision loss

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visual system plasticity in mammals: the story of monocular enucleation-induced vision loss
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie Nys, Isabelle Scheyltjens, Lutgarde Arckens

Abstract

The groundbreaking work of Hubel and Wiesel in the 1960's on ocular dominance plasticity instigated many studies of the visual system of mammals, enriching our understanding of how the development of its structure and function depends on high quality visual input through both eyes. These studies have mainly employed lid suturing, dark rearing and eye patching applied to different species to reduce or impair visual input, and have created extensive knowledge on binocular vision. However, not all aspects and types of plasticity in the visual cortex have been covered in full detail. In that regard, a more drastic deprivation method like enucleation, leading to complete vision loss appears useful as it has more widespread effects on the afferent visual pathway and even on non-visual brain regions. One-eyed vision due to monocular enucleation (ME) profoundly affects the contralateral retinorecipient subcortical and cortical structures thereby creating a powerful means to investigate cortical plasticity phenomena in which binocular competition has no vote.In this review, we will present current knowledge about the specific application of ME as an experimental tool to study visual and cross-modal brain plasticity and compare early postnatal stages up into adulthood. The structural and physiological consequences of this type of extensive sensory loss as documented and studied in several animal species and human patients will be discussed. We will summarize how ME studies have been instrumental to our current understanding of the differentiation of sensory systems and how the structure and function of cortical circuits in mammals are shaped in response to such an extensive alteration in experience. In conclusion, we will highlight future perspectives and the clinical relevance of adding ME to the list of more longstanding deprivation models in visual system research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 125 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Researcher 14 11%
Professor 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 31 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 35 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,412,793
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1,128
of 1,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,574
of 264,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#42
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.