↓ Skip to main content

Design, fabrication, and packaging of an integrated, wirelessly-powered optrode array for optogenetics application

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design, fabrication, and packaging of an integrated, wirelessly-powered optrode array for optogenetics application
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00069
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ki Yong Kwon, Hyung-Min Lee, Maysam Ghovanloo, Arthur Weber, Wen Li

Abstract

The recent development of optogenetics has created an increased demand for advancing engineering tools for optical modulation of neural circuitry. This paper details the design, fabrication, integration, and packaging procedures of a wirelessly-powered, light emitting diode (LED) coupled optrode neural interface for optogenetic studies. The LED-coupled optrode array employs microscale LED (μLED) chips and polymer-based microwaveguides to deliver light into multi-level cortical networks, coupled with microelectrodes to record spontaneous changes in neural activity. An integrated, implantable, switched-capacitor based stimulator (SCS) system provides high instantaneous power to the μLEDs through an inductive link to emit sufficient light and evoke neural activities. The presented system is mechanically flexible, biocompatible, miniaturized, and lightweight, suitable for chronic implantation in small freely behaving animals. The design of this system is scalable and its manufacturing is cost effective through batch fabrication using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology. It can be adopted by other groups and customized for specific needs of individual experiments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 123 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 34%
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 59 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Physics and Astronomy 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 27 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,718,840
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#525
of 1,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,747
of 268,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#14
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.