↓ Skip to main content

Corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory responses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory responses
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gonzalo Terreros, Paul H. Delano

Abstract

The auditory efferent system originates in the auditory cortex and projects to the medial geniculate body (MGB), inferior colliculus (IC), cochlear nucleus (CN) and superior olivary complex (SOC) reaching the cochlea through olivocochlear (OC) fibers. This unique neuronal network is organized in several afferent-efferent feedback loops including: the (i) colliculo-thalamic-cortico-collicular; (ii) cortico-(collicular)-OC; and (iii) cortico-(collicular)-CN pathways. Recent experiments demonstrate that blocking ongoing auditory-cortex activity with pharmacological and physical methods modulates the amplitude of cochlear potentials. In addition, auditory-cortex microstimulation independently modulates cochlear sensitivity and the strength of the OC reflex. In this mini-review, anatomical and physiological evidence supporting the presence of a functional efferent network from the auditory cortex to the cochlear receptor is presented. Special emphasis is given to the corticofugal effects on initial auditory processing, that is, on CN, auditory nerve and cochlear responses. A working model of three parallel pathways from the auditory cortex to the cochlea and auditory nerve is proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Russia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 165 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 23 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 51 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 12%
Psychology 18 11%
Engineering 8 5%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 35 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,349,015
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1,074
of 1,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,596
of 275,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#32
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.