↓ Skip to main content

Prefrontal-amygdala fear networks come into focus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prefrontal-amygdala fear networks come into focus
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maithe Arruda-Carvalho, Roger L. Clem

Abstract

The ability to form associations between aversive threats and their predictors is fundamental to survival. However, fear and anxiety in excess are detrimental and are a hallmark of psychiatric diseases such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD symptomatology includes persistent and intrusive thoughts of an experienced trauma, suggesting an inability to downregulate fear when a corresponding threat has subsided. Convergent evidence from human and rodent studies supports a role for the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC)-amygdala network in both PTSD and the regulation of fear memory expression. In particular, current models stipulate that the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) subdivisions of the rodent mPFC bidirectionally regulate fear expression via differential recruitment of amygdala neuronal subpopulations. However, an array of recent studies that employ new technical approaches has fundamentally challenged this interpretation. Here we explore how a new emphasis on the contribution of inhibitory neuronal populations, subcortical structures and the passage of time is reshaping our understanding of mPFC-amygdala circuits and their control over fear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 175 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 27%
Student > Master 21 12%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 70 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 20%
Psychology 18 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 36 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,169,303
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#560
of 1,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,485
of 286,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#15
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.