↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: On the possible role of stimulation duration for after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commentary: On the possible role of stimulation duration for after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kohitij Kar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 8%
Researcher 5 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 3%
Professor 1 <1%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 96 83%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 9%
Psychology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Unknown 97 84%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,348,897
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#960
of 1,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,886
of 284,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#31
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.