You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prefrontal-Hippocampal Interactions in Memory and Emotion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00170 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jingji Jin, Stephen Maren |
| Abstract |
The hippocampal formation (HPC) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) have well-established roles in memory encoding and retrieval. However, the mechanisms underlying interactions between the HPC and mPFC in achieving these functions is not fully understood. Considerable research supports the idea that a direct pathway from the HPC and subiculum to the mPFC is critically involved in cognitive and emotional regulation of mnemonic processes. More recently, evidence has emerged that an indirect pathway from the HPC to the mPFC via midline thalamic nucleus reuniens (RE) may plays a role in spatial and emotional memory processing. Here we will consider how bidirectional interactions between the HPC and mPFC are involved in working memory, episodic memory and emotional memory in animals and humans. We will also consider how dysfunction in bidirectional HPC-mPFC pathways contributes to psychiatric disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Greece | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 565 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 553 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 132 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 89 | 16% |
| Researcher | 78 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 13% |
| Unknown | 97 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 200 | 35% |
| Psychology | 87 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 8% |
| Unknown | 119 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#785,859
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#54
of 1,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,299
of 393,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#2
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.