You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
André M. Bastos, Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 10% |
| Germany | 5 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Belgium | 3 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 4% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 66% |
| Scientists | 22 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 9 | <1% |
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2180 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 573 | 26% |
| Researcher | 356 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 298 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 189 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 119 | 5% |
| Other | 279 | 13% |
| Unknown | 412 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 609 | 27% |
| Engineering | 274 | 12% |
| Psychology | 233 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 139 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 134 | 6% |
| Other | 259 | 12% |
| Unknown | 578 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#914,235
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#64
of 1,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,748
of 405,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#3
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.