↓ Skip to main content

Decoding the Semantic Content of Natural Movies from Human Brain Activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 1,408)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
102 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decoding the Semantic Content of Natural Movies from Human Brain Activity
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, October 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00081
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander G. Huth, Tyler Lee, Shinji Nishimoto, Natalia Y. Bilenko, An T. Vu, Jack L. Gallant

Abstract

One crucial test for any quantitative model of the brain is to show that the model can be used to accurately decode information from evoked brain activity. Several recent neuroimaging studies have decoded the structure or semantic content of static visual images from human brain activity. Here we present a decoding algorithm that makes it possible to decode detailed information about the object and action categories present in natural movies from human brain activity signals measured by functional MRI. Decoding is accomplished using a hierarchical logistic regression (HLR) model that is based on labels that were manually assigned from the WordNet semantic taxonomy. This model makes it possible to simultaneously decode information about both specific and general categories, while respecting the relationships between them. Our results show that we can decode the presence of many object and action categories from averaged blood-oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) responses with a high degree of accuracy (area under the ROC curve > 0.9). Furthermore, we used this framework to test whether semantic relationships defined in the WordNet taxonomy are represented the same way in the human brain. This analysis showed that hierarchical relationships between general categories and atypical examples, such as organism and plant, did not seem to be reflected in representations measured by BOLD fMRI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 328 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 23%
Researcher 55 16%
Student > Master 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Postgraduate 16 5%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 64 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 75 22%
Psychology 57 17%
Engineering 36 11%
Computer Science 26 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 5%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 88 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#321,569
of 25,550,333 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#21
of 1,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,210
of 328,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,550,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.