↓ Skip to main content

Models of Neuronal Stimulus-Response Functions: Elaboration, Estimation, and Evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Models of Neuronal Stimulus-Response Functions: Elaboration, Estimation, and Evaluation
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne F. Meyer, Ross S. Williamson, Jennifer F. Linden, Maneesh Sahani

Abstract

Rich, dynamic, and dense sensory stimuli are encoded within the nervous system by the time-varying activity of many individual neurons. A fundamental approach to understanding the nature of the encoded representation is to characterize the function that relates the moment-by-moment firing of a neuron to the recent history of a complex sensory input. This review provides a unifying and critical survey of the techniques that have been brought to bear on this effort thus far-ranging from the classical linear receptive field model to modern approaches incorporating normalization and other nonlinearities. We address separately the structure of the models; the criteria and algorithms used to identify the model parameters; and the role of regularizing terms or "priors." In each case we consider benefits or drawbacks of various proposals, providing examples for when these methods work and when they may fail. Emphasis is placed on key concepts rather than mathematical details, so as to make the discussion accessible to readers from outside the field. Finally, we review ways in which the agreement between an assumed model and the neuron's response may be quantified. Re-implemented and unified code for many of the methods are made freely available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 157 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 25%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 52 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 18%
Engineering 10 6%
Computer Science 9 6%
Psychology 8 5%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 34 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,112,694
of 25,223,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#174
of 1,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,487
of 434,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,223,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.