You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analgesic Effects of Compression at Trigger Points Are Associated With Reduction of Frontal Polar Cortical Activity as Well as Functional Connectivity Between the Frontal Polar Area and Insula in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00068 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kanae Kodama, Kouichi Takamoto, Hiroshi Nishimaru, Jumpei Matsumoto, Yusaku Takamura, Shigekazu Sakai, Taketoshi Ono, Hisao Nishijo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Brazil | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,282,252
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#614
of 1,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,630
of 375,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#14
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.