You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental and Computational Study on Motor Control and Recovery After Stroke: Toward a Constructive Loop Between Experimental and Virtual Embodied Neuroscience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00031 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Letizia Allegra Mascaro, Egidio Falotico, Spase Petkoski, Maria Pasquini, Lorenzo Vannucci, Núria Tort-Colet, Emilia Conti, Francesco Resta, Cristina Spalletti, Shravan Tata Ramalingasetty, Axel von Arnim, Emanuele Formento, Emmanouil Angelidis, Camilla H. Blixhavn, Trygve B. Leergaard, Matteo Caleo, Alain Destexhe, Auke Ijspeert, Silvestro Micera, Cecilia Laschi, Viktor Jirsa, Marc-Oliver Gewaltig, Francesco S. Pavone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 15% |
| France | 2 | 10% |
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 19 | 23% |
| Engineering | 11 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,923,467
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#145
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,652
of 432,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.