You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computational Model of Motion Sickness Describing the Effects of Learning Exogenous Motion Dynamics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2021.634604 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takahiro Wada |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 13% |
| Portugal | 1 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 9 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,328,384
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#204
of 1,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,862
of 512,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.