You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rheumatoid Cachexia Revisited: A Metabolic Co-Morbidity in Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2014.00020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kayo Masuko |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,884,566
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,285
of 4,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,893
of 361,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.