↓ Skip to main content

Effects of High-Fructose Diets on Central Appetite Signaling and Cognitive Function

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
92 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
3 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of High-Fructose Diets on Central Appetite Signaling and Cognitive Function
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2015.00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrien Lowette, Lina Roosen, Jan Tack, Pieter Vanden Berghe

Abstract

The consumption of fructose has increased tremendously over the last five decades, which is to a large extent due to the development of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), a commercial sugar additive that contains high amounts of free fructose. HFCS is often added to processed food and beverages partly because it is a powerful sweetener but even more so because the production is cheap. Although fructose in combination with fiber, vitamins, and minerals, as present in fruits, is a healthy source of energy, isolated fructose, in processed food products has been associated with several health disorders such as insulin resistance and hypertension. Apart from its metabolic consequences, a growing body of literature suggests that free fructose can also affect neuronal systems. High-fructose intake may on the one hand affect central appetite regulation by altering specific components of the endocannabinoid system. On the other hand, it appears to impact on cognitive function by affecting phosphorylation levels of insulin receptor, synapsin 1, and synaptophysin. The present report reviews the recent evidence showing a negative effect of free fructose consumption on central appetite control, as well as cognitive function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 184 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 17%
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 48 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 11%
Neuroscience 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 54 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 304. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#113,198
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#70
of 6,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,166
of 272,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.