↓ Skip to main content

The Effects of a “Health at Every Size®”-Based Approach in Obese Women: A Pilot-Trial of the “Health and Wellness in Obesity” Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Effects of a “Health at Every Size®”-Based Approach in Obese Women: A Pilot-Trial of the “Health and Wellness in Obesity” Study
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2015.00034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariana Dimitrov Ulian, Fabiana B. Benatti, Patricia Lopes de Campos-Ferraz, Odilon J. Roble, Ramiro Fernandez Unsain, Priscila de Morais Sato, Bruna Cristina Brito, Karina Akemi Murakawa, Bruno T. Modesto, Luiz Aburad, Rômulo Bertuzzi, Antonio H. Lancha, Bruno Gualano, Fernanda B. Scagliusi

Abstract

This study explored the effects of Health at Every Size(®)-based intervention on obese women by qualitatively evaluating participants' perception toward the program and quantitatively evaluating changes related to psychological, behavioral, and body composition assessments. A prospective 1-year quasi-experimental mixed-method trial was conducted. The mixed-method design was characterized by a spiral method, and quantitative and qualitative findings were combined during the interpretation phase. The qualitative data involved three focus groups; and quantitative data comprised physiological, psychological, and behavioral assessments. Initially, 30 participants were recruited; 14 concluded the intervention. From the focus groups, the following interpretative axes were constructed: the intervention as a period of discoveries; shifting parameters: psychological, physical, and behavioral changes; eating changes, and; redefining success. Body weight, body mass index, total body fat mass, and body fat percentage were significantly decreased after the intervention (-3.6, -3.2, -13.0, and -11.1%, respectively; p ≤ 0.05, within-time effect). Participants reported to be more physically active and perceiving better their bodies. Eating-wise, participants reported that the hunger and satiety cues and the consumption of more frequent meals facilitated their eating changes. Finally, participants reported that they could identify feelings with eating choices and refrain from the restrained behavior. These qualitative improvements were accompanied by modest but significant improvements in quantitative assessments. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT02102061.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 25%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 14%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Psychology 5 7%
Sports and Recreations 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 21 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2018.
All research outputs
#870,482
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#261
of 4,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,577
of 284,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them