↓ Skip to main content

Modeling-Enabled Systems Nutritional Immunology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling-Enabled Systems Nutritional Immunology
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2016.00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meghna Verma, Raquel Hontecillas, Vida Abedi, Andrew Leber, Nuria Tubau-Juni, Casandra Philipson, Adria Carbo, Josep Bassaganya-Riera

Abstract

This review highlights the fundamental role of nutrition in the maintenance of health, the immune response, and disease prevention. Emerging global mechanistic insights in the field of nutritional immunology cannot be gained through reductionist methods alone or by analyzing a single nutrient at a time. We propose to investigate nutritional immunology as a massively interacting system of interconnected multistage and multiscale networks that encompass hidden mechanisms by which nutrition, microbiome, metabolism, genetic predisposition, and the immune system interact to delineate health and disease. The review sets an unconventional path to apply complex science methodologies to nutritional immunology research, discovery, and development through "use cases" centered around the impact of nutrition on the gut microbiome and immune responses. Our systems nutritional immunology analyses, which include modeling and informatics methodologies in combination with pre-clinical and clinical studies, have the potential to discover emerging systems-wide properties at the interface of the immune system, nutrition, microbiome, and metabolism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Professor 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 19 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Computer Science 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 22 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,643,323
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#984
of 6,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,168
of 303,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.