↓ Skip to main content

The Chicago Consensus on Sustainable Food Systems Science

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Chicago Consensus on Sustainable Food Systems Science
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2017.00074
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Drewnowski, The Ecosystem Inception Team, Adam Drewnowski, Arie Havelaar, Carlos Sere, Charlotte de Fraiture, Frank Mitloehner, Henning Steinfeld, Hugo Melgar-Quinonez, John Ingram, Martin Heller, Pieter van’t Veer, Roger Clemens, Shenggen Fan, Terry Marsden, Timothy Griffin

Abstract

As participants at the Ecosystem Inception Meeting convened by the Global Dairy Platform and held in Chicago in June 2016, we have identified some concepts as central to the study of food systems science. Following the definition developed by the Food and Agriculture Organization for sustainable diets, the food supply needs to provide foods that are healthy and safe, affordable, culturally acceptable, and with low impact on the environment. Therefore, the four main domains of sustainable food systems science can be described as health, economics, society, and the environment. Food systems science needs to embrace and engage with all relevant allied disciplines that may include environmental health sciences, epidemiology, geography, history, sociology, anthropology, business, and political science. Research and training in food systems science, both domestic and international, would benefit from a set of competencies, from more extensive research networks, and from more public-private engagement. This document builds on major advances in the area of food system research, training, and practice, already achieved by individuals, institutions, foundations, and local and national governments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Professor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 29 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 23%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 32 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,285,647
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,243
of 4,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,728
of 326,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#17
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.