You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Can We Define “Optimal Microbiota?”: A Comparative Review of Structure and Functions of Microbiota of Animals, Fish, and Plants in Agriculture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2018.00090 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wakako Ikeda-Ohtsubo, Sylvia Brugman, Craig H. Warden, Johanna M. J. Rebel, Gert Folkerts, Corné M. J. Pieterse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 24% |
| Spain | 7 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 5 | 5% |
| France | 5 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 51% |
| Scientists | 36 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 71 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#674,697
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#295
of 6,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,682
of 356,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#7
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.