You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Failure to Measure Dietary Intake Engendered a Fictional Discourse on Diet-Disease Relations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2018.00105 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward Archer, Carl J. Lavie, James O. Hill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 290 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 66 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 37 | 13% |
| Canada | 13 | 4% |
| Australia | 12 | 4% |
| South Africa | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Sweden | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 128 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 207 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 54 | 19% |
| Scientists | 25 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 22% |
| Unknown | 35 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 290. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#123,520
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#77
of 7,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,248
of 356,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.