You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is Grassfed Meat and Dairy Better for Human and Environmental Health?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2019.00026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frederick D. Provenza, Scott L. Kronberg, Pablo Gregorini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 8% |
| Spain | 6 | 6% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 47 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 11% |
| Scientists | 8 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 267 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 52 | 19% |
| Researcher | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 16% |
| Unknown | 72 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 84 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 89 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 182. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#223,986
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#132
of 6,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,800
of 365,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.