You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Longitudinal Analysis Between Maternal Feeding Practices and Body Mass Index (BMI): A Study in Asian Singaporean Preschoolers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2019.00032 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Phaik Ling Quah, Jing Chun Ng, Lisa R. Fries, Mei Jun Chan, Izzuddin M. Aris, Yung Seng Lee, Fabian Yap, Keith M. Godfrey, Yap-Seng Chong, Lynette P. Shek, Kok Hian Tan, Ciaran G. Forde, Mary F. F. Chong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
Psychology | 5 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 15 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2019.
All research outputs
#12,829,922
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,584
of 4,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,622
of 351,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#37
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.