You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Listeria monocytogenes Biofilm Adaptation to Different Temperatures Seen Through Shotgun Proteomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2019.00089 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tiago Santos, Didier Viala, Christophe Chambon, Julia Esbelin, Michel Hébraud |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ghana | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,665,989
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,079
of 4,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,853
of 353,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#32
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.