You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phytochemical and Nutritional Quality Changes During Irrigation and Postharvest Processing of the Underutilized Vegetable African Nightshade
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2020.576532 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dharini Sivakumar, Anh Dao Thi Phan, Retha M. Slabbert, Yasmina Sultanbawa, Fabienne Remize |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2021.
All research outputs
#18,771,452
of 23,263,851 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,256
of 4,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,694
of 378,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#105
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,263,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.