You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Traditional Food Environment and Factors Affecting Indigenous Food Consumption in Munda Tribal Community of Jharkhand, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2020.600470 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suparna Ghosh-Jerath, Ridhima Kapoor, Satabdi Barman, Geetanjali Singh, Archna Singh, Shauna Downs, Jessica Fanzo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Zambia | 1 | 13% |
| Kenya | 1 | 13% |
| Bahrain | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 66 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 72 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,886,192
of 23,500,709 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,185
of 5,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,524
of 506,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#46
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,500,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.