You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ultrasound for Non-invasive Assessment and Monitoring of Quadriceps Muscle Thickness in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2021.622823 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alice Sabatino, Umberto Maggiore, Giuseppe Regolisti, Giovanni Maria Rossi, Francesca Di Mario, Micaela Gentile, Maria Teresa Farina, Enrico Fiaccadori |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,227,286
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,003
of 6,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,861
of 457,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#102
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.