↓ Skip to main content

Excessive Inorganic Phosphate Burden Perturbed Intracellular Signaling: Quantitative Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics Analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Excessive Inorganic Phosphate Burden Perturbed Intracellular Signaling: Quantitative Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics Analyses
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2021.765391
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Hetz, Erik Beeler, Alexis Janoczkin, Spencer Kiers, Ling Li, Belinda B. Willard, Mohammed S. Razzaque, Ping He

Abstract

Inorganic phosphate (Pi) is an essential nutrient for the human body which exerts adverse health effects in excess and deficit. High Pi-mediated cytotoxicity has been shown to induce systemic organ damage, though the underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. In this study, we employed proteomics and phosphoproteomics to analyze Pi-mediated changes in protein abundance and phosphorylation. Bioinformatic analyses and literature review revealed that the altered proteins and phosphorylation were enriched in signaling pathways and diverse biological processes. Western blot analysis confirms the extensive change in protein level and phosphorylation in key effectors that modulate pre-mRNA alternative splicing. Global proteome and phospho-profiling provide a bird-eye view of excessive Pi-rewired cell signaling networks, which deepens our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of phosphate toxicity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 21%
Unspecified 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 8 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#15,015,838
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,294
of 4,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,968
of 507,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#261
of 536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.