You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characterization of the degree of food processing in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition: application of the Nova classification and validation using selected biomarkers of food processing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.1035580 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Inge Huybrechts, Fernanda Rauber, Geneviève Nicolas, Corinne Casagrande, Nathalie Kliemann, Roland Wedekind, Carine Biessy, Augustin Scalbert, Mathilde Touvier, Krasimira Aleksandrova, Paula Jakszyn, Guri Skeie, Rashmita Bajracharya, Jolanda M. A. Boer, Yan Borné, Veronique Chajes, Christina C. Dahm, Lucia Dansero, Marcela Guevara, Alicia K. Heath, Daniel B. Ibsen, Keren Papier, Verena Katzke, Cecilie Kyrø, Giovanna Masala, Esther Molina-Montes, Oliver J. K. Robinson, Carmen Santiuste de Pablos, Matthias B. Schulze, Vittorio Simeon, Emily Sonestedt, Anne Tjønneland, Rosario Tumino, Yvonne T. van der Schouw, W. M. Monique Verschuren, Beatrice Vozar, Anna Winkvist, Marc J. Gunter, Carlos A. Monteiro, Christopher Millett, Renata Bertazzi Levy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,800,599
of 25,303,733 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,504
of 6,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,673
of 483,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#115
of 600 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,303,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 600 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.