You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Association Between Red and Processed Meat Consumption and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.801722 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Saeedeh Nouri-Majd, Asma Salari-Moghaddam, Azadeh Aminianfar, Bagher Larijani, Ahmad Esmaillzadeh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,351,427
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#577
of 6,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,996
of 519,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#47
of 553 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 553 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.