↓ Skip to main content

Best Practices for Probiotic Research in Athletic and Physically Active Populations: Guidance for Future Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best Practices for Probiotic Research in Athletic and Physically Active Populations: Guidance for Future Randomized Controlled Trials
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2022.809983
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex E. Mohr, Jamie Pugh, Orla O'Sullivan, Katherine Black, Jeremy R. Townsend, David B. Pyne, Floris C. Wardenaar, Nicholas P. West, Corrie M. Whisner, Lynne V. McFarland

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 14 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 19 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,915,014
of 26,004,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,523
of 7,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,251
of 452,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#133
of 602 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,004,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 602 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.