You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary Antioxidant Indices in Relation to All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality Among Adults With Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.849727 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenjie Wang, Xiaoyan Wang, Shiling Cao, Yiting Duan, Chengquan Xu, Da Gan, Wei He |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,512,400
of 25,168,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,696
of 6,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,252
of 436,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#164
of 676 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,168,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 676 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.