You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction for Accelerated Cold Brew Coffee Processing: Characterization and Comparison With Conventional Brewing Methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.849811 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xingchen Zhai, Mengnan Yang, Jing Zhang, Lulu Zhang, Yarong Tian, Chaonan Li, Lina Bao, Chao Ma, A. M. Abd El-Aty |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,827,035
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#916
of 4,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,101
of 465,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#102
of 618 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 618 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.