You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Probiotic Supplementation Prevents the Development of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia for Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.919156 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cong Li, Fangjie Lu, Jing Chen, Jiawei Ma, Nana Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Romania | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2022.
All research outputs
#13,403,440
of 23,947,581 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,815
of 5,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,236
of 438,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#162
of 681 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,947,581 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 681 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.