↓ Skip to main content

Association between malnutrition and contrast-associated acute kidney injury in congestive heart failure patients following coronary angiography

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between malnutrition and contrast-associated acute kidney injury in congestive heart failure patients following coronary angiography
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2022.937237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming Ying, Junqing Yang, Zhidong Huang, Yihang Ling, Bo Wang, Haozhang Huang, Qiang Li, Jin Liu, Yong Liu, Zhujun Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,802,848
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,837
of 5,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358,880
of 449,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#407
of 579 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 579 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.