↓ Skip to main content

Preparation, characterization, and osteogenic activity mechanism of casein phosphopeptide-calcium chelate

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preparation, characterization, and osteogenic activity mechanism of casein phosphopeptide-calcium chelate
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2022.960228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wen Huang, Linhui Lao, Yuliang Deng, Ziwei Li, Wanwen Liao, Shan Duan, Suyao Xiao, Yong Cao, Jianyin Miao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#19,789,047
of 24,318,236 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,762
of 5,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,033
of 420,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#419
of 693 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,318,236 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 693 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.