↓ Skip to main content

Impact of fibre and red/processed meat intake on treatment outcomes among patients with chronic inflammatory diseases initiating biological therapy: A prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of fibre and red/processed meat intake on treatment outcomes among patients with chronic inflammatory diseases initiating biological therapy: A prospective cohort study
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2022.985732
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silja H. Overgaard, Signe B. Sørensen, Heidi L. Munk, Anders B. Nexøe, Henning Glerup, Rikke H. Henriksen, Tanja Guldmann, Natalia Pedersen, Sanaz Saboori, Lone Hvid, Jens F. Dahlerup, Christian L. Hvas, Mohamad Jawhara, Karina W. Andersen, Andreas K. Pedersen, Ole H. Nielsen, Fredrik Bergenheim, Jacob B. Brodersen, Berit L. Heitmann, Thorhallur I. Halldorsson, Uffe Holmskov, Anette Bygum, Robin Christensen, Jens Kjeldsen, Torkell Ellingsen, Vibeke Andersen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#14,468,485
of 25,363,685 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,354
of 6,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,134
of 428,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#213
of 667 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,685 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 667 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.