↓ Skip to main content

Enteral formula compared to Nissen-Fundoplication: Data from a retrospective analysis on tolerance, utility, applicability, and safeness in children with neurological diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enteral formula compared to Nissen-Fundoplication: Data from a retrospective analysis on tolerance, utility, applicability, and safeness in children with neurological diseases
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2023.1093218
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiara Maria Trovato, Teresa Capriati, Giulia Bolasco, Carla Brusco, Emma Santariga, Francesca Laureti, Carmen Campana, Valentina Papa, Bianca Mazzoli, Silvia Corrado, Renato Tambucci, Giuseppe Maggiore, Antonella Diamanti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 5 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#20,867,287
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,879
of 5,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,233
of 318,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#219
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.