↓ Skip to main content

An inverse causal association between genetically predicted vitamin D and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease risk

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An inverse causal association between genetically predicted vitamin D and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease risk
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2023.1111950
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kening Lu, Jiang-Shan Tan, Tian-Qi Li, Jiaqin Yuan, Han Wang, Wenting Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2023.
All research outputs
#20,884,375
of 23,505,669 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,898
of 5,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,067
of 317,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#212
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,669 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.