↓ Skip to main content

A scoping review and critical evaluation of the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines on nutrition in the preconception

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A scoping review and critical evaluation of the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines on nutrition in the preconception
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2023.1122289
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mónica Ancira-Moreno, Soraya Burrola-Méndez, Cinthya Muñoz-Manrique, Isabel Omaña-Guzmán, Elizabeth Hoyos-Loya, Alejandra Trejo-Domínguez, Sonia Hernández-Cordero, Mónica Mazariegos, Natalia Smith, Loredana Tavano-Colaizzi, Jennifer Mier-Cabrera, Fermín Avendaño-Álvarez, Salvador Espino y Sosa, Karla Muciño-Sandoval, Lizeth Ibarra-González, Cristina Medina-Avilés

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,128,079
of 24,666,614 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,951
of 6,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,417
of 172,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#37
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,666,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.