You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Choosing an effective food classification system for promoting healthy diets in Thailand: a comparative evaluation of three nutrient profiling-based food classification systems (government, WHO, and Healthier Choice Logo) and a food-processing-based food classification system (NOVA)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1149813 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sirinya Phulkerd, Sarah Dickie, Natjera Thongcharoenchupong, Sasinee Thapsuwan, Priscila Machado, Julie Woods, Ladda Mo-Suwan, Piyada Prasertsom, Chantana Ungchusak, Chiraporn Khitdee, Mark Lawrence |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2023.
All research outputs
#16,565,847
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,027
of 6,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,137
of 377,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#167
of 455 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 455 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.