↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Prevalence of iron-deficiency anemia in pregnant women with various thalassemia genotypes: thoughts on iron supplementation in pregnant women with thalassemia genes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Prevalence of iron-deficiency anemia in pregnant women with various thalassemia genotypes: thoughts on iron supplementation in pregnant women with thalassemia genes
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2023.1254578
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min Wang, Xiaozhuang Zhang, Yanhong Zhao, Yubin Zhang, Yan Lin, Meifang Xiao, Ling Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#22,871,582
of 25,503,365 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#5,127
of 6,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,337
of 355,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#279
of 451 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,503,365 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 451 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.