You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of dietary fat intake with skeletal muscle mass and muscle strength in adults aged 20–59: NHANES 2011–2014
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1325821 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shijia Wang, Yu Zhang, Dandan Zhang, Fang Wang, Wei Wei, Qiong Wang, Yuanyuan Bao, Kang Yu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,393,521
of 25,882,826 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,075
of 7,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,340
of 356,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#162
of 421 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,882,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 421 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.