↓ Skip to main content

Dietary pattern and risk of hyperuricemia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary pattern and risk of hyperuricemia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1218912
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhao-Yan Wen, Yi-Fan Wei, Ye-Huan Sun, Wen-Ping Ji

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,498,889
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,035
of 7,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,141
of 327,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#94
of 411 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 411 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.