You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Large-scale production of non-conventional edible plants for biodiverse school meals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1282618 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guilherme Reis Ranieri, Nuno Rodrigo Madeira, Betzabeth Slater, Mariana de Toledo Marchesi, Maria Angela Delgado de Oliveira, Ana Flávia Borges Badue, Thais Mauad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,054,888
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,297
of 7,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,582
of 155,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#54
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.