↓ Skip to main content

Quality changes in Chinese high-quality indica rice under different storage temperatures with varying initial moisture contents

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality changes in Chinese high-quality indica rice under different storage temperatures with varying initial moisture contents
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1334809
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongyi Zhu, Tingting Wang, Xiuying Liu, Jie Bi, Wei Zhang, Xuefeng Zeng, Pingping Wang, Zaixi Shu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,788,926
of 25,466,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,202
of 6,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,657
of 154,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#110
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,466,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.