You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of the geriatric nutritional risk index on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a meta-analysis of observational studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1346870 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kuo-Chuan Hung, Chia-Li Kao, Chih-Wei Hsu, Chia-Hung Yu, Chien-Ming Lin, Hsiao-Tien Chen, Ying-Jen Chang, Shu-Wei Liao, I-Wen Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,970,146
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,528
of 7,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,132
of 263,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#262
of 355 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 355 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.