You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring food system resilience to the global polycrisis in six Asian countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1347186 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline Favas, Chiara Cresta, Elizabeth Whelan, Kristie Smith, Mari S. Manger, Damith Chandrasenage, Anusara Singhkumarwong, Jintana Kawasaki, Susana Moreno, Sophie Goudet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#21,027,737
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,517
of 7,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,775
of 195,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#123
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.