↓ Skip to main content

Mushrooms: a food-based solution to vitamin D deficiency to include in dietary guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mushrooms: a food-based solution to vitamin D deficiency to include in dietary guidelines
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1384273
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlene Starck, Tim Cassettari, Jutta Wright, Peter Petocz, Emma Beckett, Flavia Fayet-Moore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,999,182
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,860
of 7,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,260
of 193,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#69
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.