↓ Skip to main content

A review of the extraction and purification methods, biological activities, and applications of active compounds in Acanthopanax senticosus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of the extraction and purification methods, biological activities, and applications of active compounds in Acanthopanax senticosus
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1391601
Authors

Xindi Zhang, Lijun Guan, Ling Zhu, Kunlun Wang, Yang Gao, Jialei Li, Song Yan, Nina Ji, Ye Zhou, Xinmiao Yao, Bo Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#23,307,051
of 25,971,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#5,301
of 7,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,417
of 148,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#79
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,971,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.