↓ Skip to main content

The Paradox of Akt-mTOR Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Paradox of Akt-mTOR Interactions
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2013.00165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lakshmipathi Vadlakonda, Abhinandita Dash, Mukesh Pasupuleti, Kotha Anil Kumar, Pallu Reddanna

Abstract

The serine threonine protein kinase, Akt, is at the central hub of signaling pathways that regulates cell growth, differentiation, and survival. The reciprocal relation that exists between the two activating phosphorylation sites of Akt, T308 and S473, and the two mTOR complexes, C1 and C2, forms the central controlling hub that regulates these cellular functions. In our previous review "PI3Kinase (PI3K)-AKT-mTOR and Wnt signaling pathways in cell cycle" we discussed the reciprocal relation between mTORC1 and C2 complexes in regulating cell metabolism and cell cycle progression in cancer cells. We present in this article, a hypothesis that activation of Akt-T308 phosphorylation in the presence of high ATP:AMP ratio promotes the stability of its phosphorylations and activates mTORC1 and the energy consuming biosynthetic processes. Depletion of energy leads to inactivation of mTORC1, activation of AMPK, FoxO, and promotes constitution of mTORC2 that leads to phosphorylation of Akt S473. Akt can also be activated independent of PI3K; this appears to have an advantage under situations like dietary restrictions, where insulin/insulin growth factor signaling could be a casualty.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 263 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 31%
Researcher 44 16%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 42 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 79 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 4%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 47 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#6,876,021
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,247
of 22,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,647
of 289,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#35
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.